CTC Makes First Allocations of 2015 But California's Infrastructure Future is Murky

At its meeting last week, the California Transportation Commission allocated $174.8 million to 85 projects around the state.  Some of the projects receiving allocations this month include:

  • $22.5 million for  construction of SR-905/SR-125 connectors in San Diego
  • $20 million to realign Highway 1 in San Luis Obispo County away from the eroding shoreline
  • $19.4 million to rehabilitate the Elysian Viaduct Bridge in Los Angeles
  • $6.3 million for reabilitation of the Sierra Point Overhead bridge near South San Francisco
  • $5.9 million to replace the aging Hilt Road Overcrossing on I-5 near Yureka
  • $2.8 million to construct a shuttle maintence and repair facility at the Port of Los Angeles

You can find a full list of projects receiving funding here.  A large portion of the money came from Proposition 1B, which California voters approved in 2006.  As Caltrans reports, over $18 billion of Proposition 1B's $19.925 billion has been allocated to date.  In other words, Proposition 1B's coffers are nearly empty.  And it is not clear how they will be filled.

History of Proposition 1B

As John Frith posted in his article "Proposition 1B: A Major Success Story," Proposition 1B has been instrumental in paying for major transportation projects througout the state.  In Northern California, Prop 1B funds were used to add a fourth bore to the Caldecott Tunnel in Oakland and to build the Lincoln Bypass near Sacramento.  The biggest project in Southern California has been Caltrans' widening of I-5 in Los Angeles County -- a project that is still under construction today.  However, as Frith points out, Prop 1B is winding down leaving California with a "looming transportation fiscal cliff."

The Highway Trust Fund

California is in much the same position as the rest of the country, where the Highway Trust Fund is nearing insolvency.  This graph from the USDOT's "Highway Trust Fund Ticker" paints a disturbing picture:

And it isn't clear whether either California or the Federal government will be able to bring us back from the edge of the cliff.  The Highway Trust Fund depends on gas tax revenue and suffers from several challenges including more efficient cars, no increase in the tax in two decades, and people simply driving less.  (See the interesting graphs in Philip Bump's post "Why the Highway Trust Fund is running out of money, in 5 graphs.").  While Congress extended MAP-21 through May 2015, this was little more than a band-aid solution.  Unless Congress acts this term, and soon, the Highway Trust Fund will be out of money. We will be keeping you posted on solutions to this problem.

Enter Governor Brown's Five Year Infrastructure Plan

Meanwhile, back in our state, Governor Brown's 2015 proposed budget includes dollars for infrastructure spending and a "Five Year Infrastructure Plan."  And aside from the $815 million in one-time money, the budget draws from at least three sources: the remaining Prop 1B funds; the state's Cap-and-Trade program, and early loan repayments from the General Fund.  It is not clear if there will really be enough money to meet the anticipated needs of California's growing population.  For an interesting discussion of this issue, see Justin Ewers' article "What will be in Governor Brown's five-year infrastructure plan?"   And we will also have to wait and see whether the state legislature will actually approve this  budget.  But it seems fair to say at this point that with the decline of Prop 1B, the CTC's future allocations will look very different.

Eminent Domain Report is a one-stop resource for everything new and noteworthy in eminent domain. We cover all aspects of eminent domain, including condemnation, inverse condemnation and regulatory takings. We also keep track of current cases, project announcements, budget issues, legislative reform efforts and report on all major eminent domain conferences and seminars in the United States.

Stay Connected

RSS RSS Feed

Categories

Archives

View All Nossaman Blogs
Jump to Page

Nossaman LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek