When the government forces a property owner to sell private property, it is usually done through an eminent domain action (a direct taking), and the government is required to pay just compensation. But what if the forced sale is because the property is a public nuisance (for example, if the property is dilapidated and has code violations) -- does that constitute a taking requiring the use of eminent domain? According to a recent Court of Appeal decision, the answer is no: the forced sale of private property based on public nuisance grounds is within the government’s police powers.
In City of Fontana v. United States Bank (2022 Cal.App. Unpub. LEXIS 2127), a residence was in disrepair and the City sent the owners and their lender a notice and order to repair and abate . . .
Eminent Domain Report is a one-stop resource for everything new and noteworthy in eminent domain. We cover all aspects of eminent domain, including condemnation, inverse condemnation and regulatory takings. We also keep track of current cases, project announcements, budget issues, legislative reform efforts and report on all major eminent domain conferences and seminars in the United States.
Stay Connected
RSS Feed
Categories
- Administration
- Appraisal
- Arizona
- California
- CLIMATE CHANGE
- CONGRESS
- Construction
- Court Decisions
- Energy & Utilities
- Environmental Law
- EPA
- Events
- FAQs
- Goodwill
- GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION
- Inverse Condemnation & Regulatory Takings
- Land Use Planning
- Lawsuit
- Nevada
- New Legislation
- Possession
- Projects
- Public Agency Law
- Public Policy
- Publications
- Real Estate and Property Rights
- Redevelopment
- Regulatory Reform and Proposed Rules
- Right to Take
- Right-of-Way
- Seminars
- Speaking Engagements and Presentations
- Texas
- trial
- Valuation
- Videos
- Washington State
- Water
- Wildfire Management
